In defence of public sculpture
Whenever
a writer, an artist, an architect or any practitioner of the arts places his or
her work in the public domain there will always be those who like it and those
who don’t. This can result in controversy. If artists were to respond to every
criticism they would never create anything.
In all
fields of life there is so much more beyond our own
experience. It is the artist’s job to show the way by courageously exploring
the new. In my view, liking an artwork is not really what matters.
It’s more a question of how art challenges us or finds a way to speak to us, to
open up a new awareness.
I remember a public sculpture by Ron Robertson Swan designed for the Town
Square in central Melbourne. The sculpture, accepted by the Council, was vilified
by then City of Melbourne Mayor who, using art as a political football, renamed
it the ‘yellow peril’ from ‘the vault’. This new ‘title’ stuck and shaped the
general public’s response to the art work. Is there, I wonder, a role for our
leaders to guide citizens into an understanding of new artworks?
All this says less about the quality of art and more about people who
stoke the flames of artificially created controversies. They have not done the
work, have not taken the risks, their lives and livelihood are not bound up at
every moment with what they are making, who have given thought to the medium or
the method. Artists take risks by exposing their ideas in the public realm. At
every moment their lives are bound up with whatever they are making, with
exploring new boundaries.
Many years ago I designed a work for Swanston Street Melbourne- a shard
of architecture emerging out of the pavement- may hated the idea, thought it
was inappropriate and expressed these sentiments even before the work was
installed. However, I persevered and the council saw its merit even if not many
amongst the populace did. In time, the work was installed and has since grown to
become one of Melbourne’s icons plus a well loved sculpture.
Over the years the sculpture has gained popularity and received awards
locally and internationally: a Melbourne newspaper poll voted it the most popular
sculpture in town. Recently it was included in an internet survey of the top 25
creative sculptures around the world. The prestigious magazine ‘Architectural
Digest’ included ‘Architectural Fragment’ as one amongst eleven of the most
fascinating sculptures in the world.
I remember the hullabaloo created by citizens of Melbourne when plans
for that huge sculpture, which is Federation Square, were made public. Since
then it has become one of the most loved and popular meeting places in the
land. The new and change are always challenging. But without change and the new
we would still be in the dark ages.
There were similar controversies surrounding the
Sydney opera house, another iconic blend of architecture and sculpture that
now, along with Uluru, is the image representing Australia to many around
world.
Arts advisory panels exist all around the world
promoting creative endeavours within their communities, connecting past,
present and future, opening our eyes to things we may not see, unlocking rooms that
may be closed within us, helping to make meaning of our lives and, in the words
of Anne Michaels ‘to find a way to make beauty necessary and a way to make
necessity beautiful’.
I will leave you with the following thought. During
the Second World War, Winston Churchill’s finance minister said Britain should
cut arts funding to support the war effort. Churchill’s response: “Then what
are we fighting for?”
petrus